. |
Most Detroiters probably won't argue the fact that public transportation in Detroit has basically been on a major decline now for decades. But many may be surprised to learn that the steady decline in reliable service actually began many years prior to the formation of DDOT. As a matter of fact, the former DSR operation was reorganized in order to prevent the inevitable collapse of what was once a proud, reliable, and respectable leader in the transit industry.
Of course, the need for a major name change for the bus system during the early seventies had become obvious. Since the "Department of Street Railways" could no longer be considered a street railway operation — after discontinuing the last of its streetcar service on April 8, 1956, its name had long become obsolete. But aside from the fact that a more appropriate name was needed, other more important factors would play a major role in the department's restructuring.
But more importantly, the Detroit City Charter mandated that all of the agency's operating expenses could only be paid through fare-box revenues. Although the DSR was owned by the City of Detroit, not one-cent of city tax money could be spent on the agency. Consequently, during its first forty years of operation, the DSR operated solely out of the fare-box.
But after the ridership numbers began to decline during the late forties and early fifties, and as fare-box revenues dropped and operating expenses increased, this charter requirement proved to be a major burden for the department. By the mid-to-late sixties, major cuts in bus service were being proposed. By the arrival of the early seventies, the city's transit system was on the verge of facing possible bankruptcy.
Many issues over the years — all too numerous to go into detail in this article — helped to contribute to the ridership decline the transit operation faced. As these factors continued to make an impact, it was becoming evident by the sixties that the former transit system needed to be restructured, or the City of Detroit faced the possibility of not having a public transportation system to serve its populace. Obviously, the fare-box revenues alone could no longer provide the needed money for the DSR to operate.
Another boost for the ailing DSR would later come on Tuesday, November 4, 1969, after Detroit voters approved another amendment to the Charter — Proposition "A" — which granted the Common Council budgetary control over the transit agency, similar to what the council had over other city departments. The amendment now permitted the Council to use general city tax funds to provide any needed assistance to the DSR. It also removed the restrictions that all DSR operating expenses must be paid from fare-box revenues alone.
With the transit agency's budget now under the control of the Common Council, it was now felt by many — led primarily by Councilman Mel Ravitz — that the time had come for the DSR to be restructured, and to come under the full control of the City of Detroit. Meanwhile, with the much-amended "horse-and-buggy-era" 1918 City Charter already in the process of being completely rewritten for the first time in over fifty years — as a result of a voter approved Charter Revision mandate — a charter revision opportunity was now possible regarding the future of the DSR and could soon become a reality. If approved, a charter revision restructuring of the DSR could take effect as soon as July, 1974.
Under the 1974 Detroit City Code: Article 7, Chapter 14, Section 7-1401; the transportation department shall:
On Monday, July 1, 1974, at 12:01AM, the Detroit Department of Transportation (D-DOT) took over as the transit providing agency for the City of Detroit.
. |
. |
Coach #1577 displays the second paint scheme design used on DDOT coaches beginning with the GMC RTSs delivered in 1978. |
|
Preserving the History of Public Transportation in and around the City of Detroit, ...from "Steel Wheels to Rubber Tires." |
For Comments and/or Suggestions Contact Site Owner at: admin@detroittransithistory.info |
Search Website by Topic: |
The 1974 charter, under Article 7, Chapter 14, Section 7-1402, also abolished the three-membered Board of Street Railway Commission, which had been the policy-making governing authority of the former DSR, while Article 5, Section 5-103 granted the sole authority to supervise, manage and control the department to an administrative head, or a "Director" of Transportation, appointed by the mayor. The three Street Railway Commissioners were replaced by a new Advisory Commission for Transportation, composed of at least five members, also appointed by the mayor, but who were limited to only making recommendations (under the guidelines of Article 7, Chapter 1, Section 7-103).
Since there didn't exist a dedicated local transit tax at that time earmarked to support public transportation in southeastern Michigan, this new arrangement would now allow for the city to help subsidize and govern the transit system until a regional transit tax, and a proposed take-over by the then recently formed Southeastern Michigan Transportation Authority (SEMTA), could be approved.
Unfortunately, after years of city and suburban fighting over this issue, it has now been nearly forty years and no regional take-over of the system has ever resulted, and a dedicated transit tax to support the Detroit system never materialized. As a consequence, DDOT remains to this day just another revenue producing city department, and largely subsidized by the city's general fund, to the tune of $80 million annually in recent years.
For better or for worse, D-DOT has continued now for four decades providing transit services to Detroiters.
Click here to return to "THE D-DOT YEARS" Main Page. |
THE LAUNCHING OF THE DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION (The Reasons Behind the Name Change from D.S.R. to D-DOT) |
Variations of the "official" D.O.T. logo have been in use by D-DOT since the transit agency was launched on July 1, 1974. |
. |
PRINTER- FRIENDLY WEB-PAGE |
(Reformatted 06-20-12) |
The original 1974 DDOT logo |
Redesigned logo launched in Sept., 2007 |